Categories
Other

The winner of ‘The Ghosts of Eden’ is……

Andrew Sharp has mulled over your entries into the competition to win a copy of his book, The Ghosts of Eden, and decided on a winner. I’ll let him take over from here…..

sharpThank-you to all who responded to the question I put about writing from the perspective of someone from a different culture.

We are fond of saying that everyone on the planet, whatever their background, has a shared humanity. This cannot relate to a shared way of seeing things. We can’t even be sure how our closest friends see their world: their purple, may be your crimson, the trinket you love can look to them like the last word in tat, what they think of as being honest you see as being insensitive. Our common humanity relates not to our perceptions but to our emotions: fear, impatience, empathy for others and so on. These feelings are universal whatever our culture, and when they are absent (as in some forms of personality disorder – see Sebastian Faulks’ Engelby) we worry that that person is missing something vital to being human. So a writer trying to portray a character from a different culture from their own should start with that common thread; should lead the reader to share the character’s emotions.

From there on it gets complicated and opinionated. The controversy lies in the way a writer portrays how their character from a different culture sees their world, and how they react to their world. For a long and in depth discussion on this see a blog by Mary Anne Mohanraj, or this by Neesha Meminger.

As an aside, our inclination to stereotype others is so natural to us that it probably had an evolutionary advantage: safest to make assumption that big man with big brow ridge on narrow path ahead of me means danger, rather than gentle giant.

Violet’s comment that when she reads books by non-Indians about Indians she cringes, was telling. ‘…they write what the world expects’ and by world I guess that she is referring to what could be called ‘the majority reader’, who is culturally European and might be referred to as belonging to the ‘default culture’. One day the tables may be turned and the default culture for most readers may be African or Chinese.
 

I enjoyed J. T. Oldfield’s example from Hamlet about a culturally determined response to a story.

Dorte H. made a perceptive comment about Alexander McCall Smith choosing to write from the distance which humour creates in his novels set in Botswana.

Susan Shearer commented on how writing about another culture helps us to look at ourselves and how we live. This reminds me of a quote from the writer Jean Rhys: Reading makes immigrants of us all. It takes us away from home …

Matthew points out that a writer can certainly breathe life into a foreign character, but only if they have done their research.

Ros makes the astute observation that sometimes outsiders can have the detachment to see things that a native to the culture cannot.

Kristen says that while a clichéd description may have an element of truth the writer must go beyond the cliché and capture the heart and essence of the foreign place and people.

Wendy commented that historical novels depict a culture that may be very different to our own, and get away with it very well, although of course the authors of those novels have the advantage that the representatives of that period cannot answer back – unless that’s what ghosts are trying to do!

Debnance: Mercy? Point taken!

Lori L finds authenticity in a novel essential, and finds that some books written by local UK authors are not even true to the area of the UK that they are set in.

Thanks Kristi H for your comment about the reader’s part in all this. The reader brings their imagination to bear as much as the author.

Teddy also makes an observation about the reader saying that the reader may need to set aside their own cultural pre-suppositions to feel the full force of the story.

 

So thank-you to you all for your thought-provoking and diverse comments. I wish you could each have a free copy but I can see my publisher’s raised eyebrows (she’s otherwise charming, by the way) so I have to make a choice.

 A signed copy is on its way to you, Violet. I found I mulled a lot over your comment about what the ‘world expects to read’. I do hope that you enjoy the novel. My question was a rather heavy, serious question but I think you’ll find the book just gets on with telling a story. There’s a website on the background to the book at www.theghostsofeden.com although I suggest you read the book first before looking at the reading group questions page as it has one or two ‘plot spoilers’.

Congratulations Violet!

Let me know your address and a copy will be on it’s way to you very soon!

I’d like to thank Andrew Sharp for taking the time to judge this competition. I wish him all the best with the book – it deserves much more recognition than it is currently getting.

If you weren’t lucky enough to win the competition then please try to find a copy of The Ghosts of Eden – it really is good!

 

Categories
Booker Prize

Reading in the Dark – Seamus Deane

Short Listed for the Booker Prize 1996

Reading in the Dark is set during the troubled times of Ireland, between 1945 and 1961. The story is told through the eyes of a young boy growing up within the violence, under strict Catholic parents. The unnamed boy has to deal with family secrets, and his mother becoming unable to cope with it all. Religious beliefs and superstitions play a big part in his childhood, and his innocence means that he is often left bewildered.

It is similar to Paddy Clarke Ha Ha Ha in many respects, but much I found it much easier to read. This is because it lacks the stream of consciousness prose found in Paddy Clark Ha Ha Ha and the plot is easier to follow.

The main fault I found with the book is that it is very depressing. There is the odd glimmer of happiness occasionally, but it is quickly stamped out where-ever it tries to occur. This led to a book which I didn’t find enjoyable to read.  The plot seemed to move from one tragedy to the next and there never seemed to be any hope.

I didn’t really connect with the main character because he just seemed too caught up in his own emotions and a bit weak – I prefer my characters to have a bit of feistiness!

If you enjoyed Paddy Clarke Ha Ha Ha then I think you’ll love this, but it just wasn’t for me.

stars3

 

I think Angela’s Ashes is my favourite book set in Ireland. What is yours?

Categories
Blogging Other

What I’ve been up to and a few other links

You might notice that I’ve made a few changes around here. The annoying thing is that most of them are behind the scenes, so as you won’t be able to tell what has taken up so much of my time this weekend. I hope you can notice a slight difference though.

Here is what I’ve done.

  1. Changed my blog theme to one which supports threaded comments and performs better in the search rankings.
  2. Upgraded to Word-press 2.8.
  3. Found and added new plug-ins after I discovered half of my old ones didn’t work with Word-press 2.8!
  4. Added a broad column above the two single ones in my sidebar.
  5. Changed a few of the things I display in my sidebar.

It has taken me ages, but I am really pleased with the results.

The main thing I am really excited to have achieved is that I have now made the front page for people googling ‘book blog’ in the UK.

There are still a few things that aren’t quite as I’d like them, but I think I’ll leave them for another day!

A Few Links

Thanks to Cornflower Books for finding this link to the most Beautiful Libraries in the world

On a similar theme I have just discovered the RobAroundBooks Blog. He has a great bookshelf of the week feature along with lots of other interesting bookish posts. If you’ve never heard of him before, then go and take a look – I think you’ll like what you see! 

A Few Books Which Have Caught My Eye

Violet from VioletCrush recommended My Father’s Paradise by Ariel Sabar. I liked the sound of this one so much I bought a copy!

.

.

.

Stuck in a Book recommended Parents and Children by Ivy Compton-Burnett. I bought this one too!

.

Megan from a little breeze recommended Wanting by Richard Flanagan. I’ll buy this one when it gets a bit cheaper! 

.

.

An Award

Finally I’ve just received this award from Another Cookie Crumbles. Thank you so much! I love your blog too!

Categories
Other

I’m making a few changes…

screw

This weekend I am doing some major work behind the scenes on my blog. Many of the features/links won’t be working, so please bear with me while I tinker with things.

Hopefully I’ll have a lovely new, fully functioning site by Monday.

Wish me luck!

Categories
Classics Other Quiz

Can you guess the classic from it’s cover? The answers.

Last Saturday I challenged you to guess the classic from the pictures below. All are classics that we know and love, but did you guess which was which?

Here are the answers:

covera

A – Wuthering Heights

 

.

.

 

coverb

B – The Moonstone

.

.

 

 

..

coverc

C – Bleak House

.

..

 

.

coverd

D  War and Peace

.

.

 

 .

covereE -Pride and Prejudice

.

..

.

.

coverf

F – Frankenstein

..

.

..

coverg

G – Treasure Island

.

.

..

 

Congratulations to everyone who guessed a cover correctly – especially Claire who managed to guess Treasure Island!

Categories
2008 2009 Thriller

Six Suspects – Vikas Swarup

I loved Q&A (the book the film Slumdog Millionaire is based on) and so was excited to find Vikas Swarup’s latest book in the library. Unfortunately Six Suspects isn’t quite as good as Q&A.

The title refers to the six people who are all discovered carrying a gun at a party in which Vicky Rai, the son of a high-profile Indian Minister, is shot. Through a series of short stories we see into the lives of these people, and their motives for killing Vicky Rai are revealed.

Some sections were really good, especially the story of the mobile phone thief who found a briefcase full of money, but this seemed too similar to the central character in Q&A, who also suddenly comes into a lot of money. It felt like the best sections from Q&A had been condensed and then repeated here.

There were many sections of the book which seemed unlikely, and it didn’t have to charm be able to pull it off. One of the characters gets kidnapped and this section in particular seemed very unrealistic. The book touches on some very difficult subjects, including suicide bombings and poverty, but I felt these were rushed over and so I failed to get an insight into the minds of these people.  The fact that there were six central characters also meant that I didn’t really bond with them that well, as by the time I was getting to know them they were replaced with the next suspect. The sights and sounds of India were also not as present in this book as they should have been.

It is a light, easy read, and it’s 560 pages fly by, but I was disappointed by the ending, as although it is quite clever, it isn’t possible to work out who the murderer is, and that is what I love most about thrillers.

Overall, it was OK, but I recommend you read Q&A instead.

stars3h

Did you enjoy reading Q&A?

I haven’t seen the film Q&A yet? Which did you prefer – the book or the film?