Categories
Other Weekly Geeks

Weekly Geeks – Historical Fiction

The weekly assignment for Weekly Geeks is to discuss historical fiction.

 

 

I love historical fiction. Knowing that the book you are reading is based on events which actually happened adds to the magic of them. It’s also a great way to learn about history, without having to get bogged down in dry text books!

I don’t have a favourite historical era – I love reading about all different periods of history.

 

My favourite historical fiction book is probably The Other Boleyn Girlby Phillipa Gregory. I read this pre-blogging, so haven’t written a review of it yet, but two great reviews are here:

Book Club Queen
All Things Girl 

The writing is so  vivid that you become totally immersed in 16th century life. I highly recommend that you read it.

 

One of my other favourite historical fiction reads is The Clan of the Cave Bear by Jean Auel. This book is set 35,000 years ago, and gives a great insight into early human life. The characterisation and plot are amazing, and this book is one of my all time favourite reads. 

I’m not sure that either of these books are appropriate for a book club read, as they are both a bit too long, but there is a lot to discuss if you do give them a go.

Categories
Interview Other

An Interview with Chris Tusa, author of ‘Dirty Little Angels’

headshot

 

Chris Tusa is the author of Dirty Little Angels, which is set in the slums of New Orleans, and follows 16-year-old Hailey as she deals with problems within her family, and the dark world of drugs and violence that surround her. You can read my review here. 

After reading his debut novel, Chris kindly agreed to answer a few of my questions.

 Congratulations on getting your first novel published! What is the best thing about having your book in print?
It’s very exciting to know that people all over the world are reading a book I’ve written. Specifically, it’s rewarding to know that people (assuming the book impacts them) are being drawn into a world (and toward characters) that I created.
When you started writing the book did you have the whole plot in your mind, or did it develop as you went along?
I had a general plot in mind, but the interesting thing about writing is that the characters (once developed) often have their own ideas of where the story should go.

Did you do any special research before writing the book?
Occasionally, I did have to locate bits of information I wasn’t familiar with-the location of a street, a song title, etc. In general, though, there wasn’t much research.

What thoughts would you like readers to have on finishing Dirty Little Angels?
I want readers to be impacted on an emotional level, and I want them, as a result of reading the book, to contemplate their own lives. This is primarily why I choose to write about such desperate and downtrodden people. In my opinion, readers learn more about themselves when they read about desperate people. Desperation and tragedy truly transform us, primarily by forcing us to contemplate our own lives. It may sound strange, but I don’t have any desire to write safe, happy little books filled with characters that readers grow to admire. Of course, I want readers to experience a gamut of emotions while reading, but I’m happiest when a reader tells me they hate one of my characters. When they hate a character (like Moses) I know I’ve impacted them on an emotional level, mostly because when readers begin to hate a character, they begin to truly learn about themselves.

Your first book, Haunted Bones, is a collection of poetry. Do you prefer writing novels or poetry?
I like writing poetry, but it is not nearly as rewarding as writing fiction. I can sit and down and spend a day writing, and when I’m done (on a good day), I’ll have a poem I’m happy with. Novels take years to write, and there are so may things that can go wrong. It’s very daunting, which makes it more rewarding when you’re done. Poems are sprints. Novels are marathons. And to be honest, now that I’ve run the marathon, I want to run as many as a I can.

How did you get published? Did you have an agent?
Initially, my agent sent the ms out to a number of large NY publishers. Two of them liked the ms and asked for revisions, but neither was happy with the changes. A friend of mine recommended the University of West Alabama, and I decided to send it to them. They liked it, and the rest is history.

Who are your favourite authors?
My favorite writers are Kurt Vonnegut, Chuck Palahniuk, Harry Crews, Daniel Woodrell, Flannery O’Connnor, Tennessee Williams, and George Orwell.

Are you planning to write more books in the future?
Definitely. Currently, I’m working on a novel involving a very dysfunctional family. Essentially, it’s a dark tragicomedy/satire that focuses on a man named Walter Piggert who, after having visions of the Virgin Mary, becomes convinced he’s the Second Coming of Christ.

Thank you Chris, for taking the time to answer my questions. Good luck with your next novel!

Categories
Other

Victorian Challenge Complete!

The Victorian Challenge is being hosted by Alex, and it’s aim is to encourage people to read more books written during, or based in the Victorian Era.

I signed up to the Walk in Hyde Park level – 4 books, although I actually managed to read five books:  

1. Wuthering Heights – Emily Bronte

Irritating characters, and a miserable plot – I don’t think I have ever read a book where there isn’t at least one tiny ray of light somewhere! It’s a classic though, so I’m glad I read it.

2. The Suspicions of Mr. Whicher – Kate Summerscale

The true story of the crime which inspired the first detective novel (The Moonstone– see below). Meticulously researched, and packed with interesting facts and observations about Victorian life. Highly recommended.

3. The Moonstone– Wilkie Collins

2003 Paperback

The first ever detective novel. Slow in places, but tightly plotted. Recommended.

4. Three Men in a Boat – Jerome K. Jerome

Slightly silly story about a journey up the  River Thames. Recommended to anyone who has a knowledge of the river.

5. The Seance– John Harwood

Mysterious Gothic Tale, packed with twists and turns. Recommended.

stars41

 

I have really enjoyed taking part in this challenge. All the books were worth reading, although I particularly recommend The Suspicions of Mr. Whicher.
This is the first challenge I have ever completed, so I’m pleased I enjoyed it so much. I look forward to taking part in it again next year.

Categories
Meme Other

Booking Through Thursday – The Worst ‘Best’ Book

btt button

 “What’s the worst ‘best’ book you’ve ever read — the one everyone says is so great, but you can’t figure out why?”

There are two books that stick out for me:

 

Out Stealing Horses was almost universally raved about, not only by people on Amazon, but also many of my most trusted blogging friends. I was really looking forward to reading it, but was very disappointed. There were a few good scenes in the book, but for the majority of it I was really bored.

I also seem to get irritated by all Mitch Albom books. They are overly sentimental, and just seem like one long lecture on appreciating your mother, (in the case of For One More Day) or various other members of your family/friends (all his other books). Everyone else seems to love them, but they are just far too fluffy and obvious for me.

I recommend you read these book though, as I think I am just about the only person on the planet who has these opinions!

Categories
Other

Prize Winning Book Suggestions

I was looking through the books I plan to read for the Book awards reading challenge, and noticed that almost all of them have won different prizes.

 

Technically I’ve completed this challenge already, as I have read multiple Bookers, Orange and Pulitzer books, but I thought it would be great if every book had won a different prize. This would be more of a challenge for me, and I like the thought of completing book award BINGO!

 

Can anyone recommend a book to complete my set? It needs to have won one of the eligible awards on the challenge site (see link above), and be amazing!

 

  1. The Blind Assassin – Margaret Atwood (Winner of Booker Prize, 2000) completed 29th October 2008
  2. Out Stealing Horses – Per Petterson (Winner of IMPAC Dublin Prize, 2007) completed 20th November 2008
  3. The Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay – Micheal Chabon (Winner of Pulitzer Prize, 2001) completed 27th November 2008
  4. The Fingersmith – Sarah Waters (Winner of the CWA Ellis Peters Dagger for Historical Crime Fiction) completed 14th December 2008
  5. We Need to Talk About Kevin – Lionel Shriver  (Winner of Orange Prize, 2005) completed 14th January 2009
  6. Blindness – Jose Saramago (Nobel Prize, 1998) completed 5th March 2009
  7. The Secret River – Kate Grenville (Winner of Commonwealth Writers’ Prize, 2006) 
  8. Theory of War – John Brady (Winner of Costa/Whitbread Award, 1993) 
  9. Peace Like a River – Leif Enger (Alex Award, 2002) 

10. PLEASE HELP ME TO DECIDE!

I look forward to hearing all your suggestions!

Categories
Other Weekly Geeks

Weekly Geeks – Worst Movie Adaptation

 

 

 

The weekly assignment for Weekly Geeks:

Worst movie adaptations: The recent release of Watchmen based on the graphic novel by Alan Moore got me thinking about what I thought were the worst movie adaptations of books. What book or books did a director or directors completely ruin in the adaptation(s) that you wish you could “un-see,” and why in your opinion, what made it or them so bad in contrast to the book or books?
 

The Golden Compass was one of the worst film adaptations of a book I have seen. Entertainment Weekly agree with me, and voted it the most disappointing movie adpatation of all time. I loved the book; it’s rich, original plot was packed with great characters, vivid descriptions and thought provoking topics, making it one of my favourite novels of all time.

The film failed to come anywhere close to my expectations. It was so short, that it felt as though everything was being crammed in as quickly as possible. Many of the most interesting religious aspects of the book were not included, or glossed over really quickly. I’m not sure how anyone who has not read the book would have have managed to follow the plot, but I urge you to read the book, and ignore the film.

 


I’m not sure that it counts, as I haven’t actually seen the film, but I can’t imagine how they managed to make a screen version of Blindness, which I read recently. The reviews seem to indicate that they haven’t. The unique feature of this excellent, but scary book, is that the characters have been affected by an epidemic of blindness, and so cannot see a thing. This leads everything in the book to be described through the other five senses, making the reader effectively blind too. Showing the action on camera will ruin this main feature of the book, diliuting the intensity of its message. Many of the scenes were powerful and disturbing, and I find it hard to imagine how they could have been sensitively shot. If you have read the book, and seen the movie, then I’d love to know your opinion of them.

 


The Cat in the Hat has to be the worst movie adaptation of a book for me. The book is a delightful, rhyming children’s story about a mischievous cat who entertains a young boy and girl with ever more daring and messy games. My children love listening to it again and again, so we were really looking forward to watching the film together over Christmas. My boys lost interest in it very quickly. The film is too slow, wih nothing remotely funny happening for half an hour. The action, when it does occur, is so spread out that I found myself clock-watching the majority of the time. None of the magic of the book is present, there is no rhyming, and the cat come across as annoying, rather than endearing.

The Cat in the Hat is my most disappointing movie adaptation. What’s yours?